Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 01:35

What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
It’s back! Massive $400 price drop now live on 2TB Space Black M4 iPad Pro at Amazon - 9to5Toys
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Here's Where Traders Expect Broadcom Stock to Go After Earnings - Investopedia
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What's an underrated/unknown novel or series that you think deserves more attention?
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Astronomers Just Discovered One of the Fastest Jets Ever in a Radio-Quiet Galaxy - The Daily Galaxy
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
‘Titan: The OceanGate Disaster’ Review: The Horrors of Hubris on Netflix - WSJ